See the workflow first. Price the right rollout after that.
Most teams do not know the right participant count, reporting shape, or control depth before first use. ForQuiz starts with a scoped workflow pilot, then prices around the rollout you actually need. For selected teams, the first pilot can run at no software cost to prove the workflow with real participants.
Pick a tier before you know adoption.
Buy seats you may not use.
Pay for features that do not match your workflow.
Discover real reporting needs after procurement is done.
Start with one workflow that matters.
Run the live and async loop with real participants.
See which controls, reports, and support levels matter.
Tailor the pilot around the metrics and reporting your company cares about.
Price from evidence once the workflow is proven.
How pricing usually works
One clear path reduces decision friction: prove the workflow, then choose the commercial model that matches real use.
Pick one rollout, chapter flow, readiness check, or campaign you want to prove first.
Selected teams can run the first pilot at no software cost with live sessions, controlled async checks, identity rules, and exports.
After the pilot, we price around usage, reporting, and support needs instead of guesswork.
What shapes the final price
We price around value and operating load, not a random feature checklist. If one missing metric view, export, or access rule is blocking adoption, we can scope that into the pilot.
Pricing changes with participant volume, batch count, or department scope.
Live-only, async-only, or live plus follow-up changes the operational load.
Email, domain, phone, custom IDs, allowlists, and one-attempt rules affect setup depth.
Exports, comparisons, rollout help, and hands-on support change the commercial shape.
We can tailor pilot reporting, metric views, and workflow details around the outcomes your company actually cares about.
Common buying paths
Three paths are enough to orient most buyers. The right one depends on the job you need ForQuiz to do.
For training, onboarding, enablement, and readiness-led rollouts.
Usually priced by participant volume, department scope, or quarterly team license
Fits live plus async follow-up workflows
Good for managers who need exports and topic-level proof
For coaching, test-prep, cohort education, and repeated practice programs.
Usually priced by active learner count, batch count, or center package
Fits class battles, homework checks, and weak-topic reporting
Good for teams running repeated chapter or batch workflows
For quiz-led campaigns, webinar challenges, and community activations.
Usually priced by campaign scope or participant band
Fits score-based campaigns with result sharing and exports
Good when the quiz is the mechanism of engagement, not an add-on
Tell us the workflow you want to prove
Share one concrete use case and we will scope the right pilot instead of pushing you into a generic tier. For selected teams, the first pilot can run at no software cost, and we can tailor the reporting and success metrics around what your company needs to see.
You can also email susmit.py@gmail.com directly.